<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woman Fired For Facebook Status Update, Might Have Deserved It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/</link>
	<description>News That Matters, At Least Around The Water Cooler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:04:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook w miejscu pracy</title>
		<link>http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook w miejscu pracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinterrupt.com/?p=4029#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>[...] Co o Facebooku powinni wiedzieć pracodawcy? Kilka rzeczy. Po pierwsze, że wielu pracowników posiada tam konto. A im młodszy pracownik tym prawdopodobieństwo jest wyższe. Po drugie, że co drugi taki pracownik sprawdza swoje konto codziennie. Po trzecie, że taki pracownik spędza średnio 55 minut w serwisie. Pomijam tutaj, że warto też zaglądać na Facebook, żeby zobaczyć co pracownicy mówią o firmie, albo swoim szefie. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Co o Facebooku powinni wiedzie? pracodawcy? Kilka rzeczy. Po pierwsze, ?e wielu pracowników posiada tam konto. A im m?odszy pracownik tym prawdopodobie?stwo jest wy?sze. Po drugie, ?e co drugi taki pracownik sprawdza swoje konto codziennie. Po trzecie, ?e taki pracownik sp?dza ?rednio 55 minut w serwisie. Pomijam tutaj, ?e warto te? zagl?da? na Facebook, ?eby zobaczy? co pracownicy mówi? o firmie, albo swoim szefie. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GIO</title>
		<link>http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator>GIO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinterrupt.com/?p=4029#comment-1361</guid>
		<description>Nah thats pretty bad, i wudda fired her, because she was a bad worker, he was probz gonna fire her at the end of her trial as she only had 2 weeks left.

If she didnt have her boss as a friend she might still be in a job, u just gotta be careful n shite, dont u ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah thats pretty bad, i wudda fired her, because she was a bad worker, he was probz gonna fire her at the end of her trial as she only had 2 weeks left.</p>
<p>If she didnt have her boss as a friend she might still be in a job, u just gotta be careful n shite, dont u ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C. S. Magor</title>
		<link>http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>C. S. Magor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinterrupt.com/?p=4029#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>I disagree, she questioned his character and virtually accused him of sexual harassment in a public forum. That is what &quot;pervy&quot; means after all, someone who pervs, or leers. The word &quot;wanker&quot; expresses contempt. 

Whether it is personal pride or not, I wouldn&#039;t want to work with a person spreading malicious gossip or who held me in contempt and I would certainly not allow anyone like that to work for me. The fact is, with the economy in its present state, employers can afford to be choosy. This wasn&#039;t simply bemoaning a bad day at work or posting on FB on a sick day, she called his character into question and there have to be consequences for something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, she questioned his character and virtually accused him of sexual harassment in a public forum. That is what &#8220;pervy&#8221; means after all, someone who pervs, or leers. The word &#8220;wanker&#8221; expresses contempt. </p>
<p>Whether it is personal pride or not, I wouldn&#8217;t want to work with a person spreading malicious gossip or who held me in contempt and I would certainly not allow anyone like that to work for me. The fact is, with the economy in its present state, employers can afford to be choosy. This wasn&#8217;t simply bemoaning a bad day at work or posting on FB on a sick day, she called his character into question and there have to be consequences for something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kk</title>
		<link>http://weinterrupt.com/2009/08/woman-receives-fired-for-facebook-status-update-might-have-deserved-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator>Kk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinterrupt.com/?p=4029#comment-1333</guid>
		<description>Hmmm , I&#039;d have to side with the woman about this one.  Should she have been more discerning with her status updates?  Sure.  Should she have friended her boss?  No.  Is complaining about your boss a crime?  No.  Looks like she posted after hours, on a social networking site about a complaint and did not mention any names (no libel）.  Freedom of speech.  She could make the argument that she has another job.. Or was talking about someone else.  I&#039;d say the boss dropped the ball in showing any professionalism.  He could have sent her an email talking about correct work ethics or removed himself as her friend.  Sounds like he&#039;s holding a grudge and firing her for that reason.  If he was so displeased with her performance, why wait until this moment and this manner to fire her?  It doesn&#039;t have to do with performance, but has everything to do with his wounded pride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm , I&#8217;d have to side with the woman about this one.  Should she have been more discerning with her status updates?  Sure.  Should she have friended her boss?  No.  Is complaining about your boss a crime?  No.  Looks like she posted after hours, on a social networking site about a complaint and did not mention any names (no libel?.  Freedom of speech.  She could make the argument that she has another job.. Or was talking about someone else.  I&#8217;d say the boss dropped the ball in showing any professionalism.  He could have sent her an email talking about correct work ethics or removed himself as her friend.  Sounds like he&#8217;s holding a grudge and firing her for that reason.  If he was so displeased with her performance, why wait until this moment and this manner to fire her?  It doesn&#8217;t have to do with performance, but has everything to do with his wounded pride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
