Postal worker delivers mail in the buff, gets arrested

Like that episode of Seinfeld taught us—there’s good naked, and there’s bad naked.  Just to clarify, any naked that gets you arrested is bad naked, no matter how noble your intentions may be.

A Wisconsin mail carrier claims he was only trying to cheer up a woman on his route who seemed, as he put it, “stressed out,” when he decided to deliver her mail on December 4 in nothing but his birthday suit and (hopefully) a well placed mailbag.

Upon further review, the 52-year-old postal employee realized he made quite the mistake, telling police that maybe delivering the mail bare assed wasn’t the smartest thing in the world to do.  Seeing that there’s an examination that must be passed to become a postal worker, you’d think that our man here would have figured that out in advance of performing his duties completely nude.

The mail carrier was arrested a few days after the incident for lewd and lascivious behavior.

The only concern I have is, with it being December 4, and Wisconsin not known for it’s balmy winter temperatures, was there a significant amount of shrinkage, and if so, who’s stress level did that affect more—his or hers?

[ABC 13]

Categories
News

Jeff Greenwell is the writer/editor of Last Angry Fan. Jeff has been known to rock a Speedo while belting out Robert Goulet tunes from his front porch, and in his spare time he enjoys capturing and training feral goats to be his minions. Also known to dig a nice brick of cheese from time to time.
2 Comments on this post.
  • naked mail carrier « moonlit garden
    16 December 2010 at 12:18 am
    Leave a Reply

    […] Postal worker delivers mail in the buff, gets arrested (weinterrupt.com) […]

  • Tweets that mention Postal worker delivers mail in the buff, gets arrested — Topsy.com
    17 December 2010 at 12:15 am
    Leave a Reply

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by CSMagor, Alltop Odd. Alltop Odd said: Postal worker delivers mail in the buff, gets arrested http://bit.ly/fwzrPd Oddities.alltop.com […]

  • Leave a Reply

    *

    *

    Editor's Picks